Don't suppose you know anything about the dude that April was with? Boyfriend? Studio employee? Both?Charmed said:If this was just a 30 day ban, then by end of Monday the 25th of March, we should see some of them returning.
The only men that work in the studio are the Programmers. They are the guys who run the tech part of the studio, internet and any tech needs. They also go through and save all the recordings of the girls. Somewhere there is a server with all the girls group shows, privates, and any other show from MFC and other sites. You also have the owner and her husband, but they do not live in Ukraine. To answer your question, most likely he is one of the three programmers. The admins are Models that still work the cam to offset their salary. The manager comes from the models as well. Some might remember Usexy_friend. She became a manager. Eventually the stress made her leave Allure. Scam_Models said:Don't suppose you know anything about the dude that April was with? Boyfriend? Studio employee? Both?
I wonder why they do that. Why keep thousands of hours of videos? That must cost some decent cash. If the videos are not going to be used, then why spend the time and money to save the videos?Charmed said:Somewhere there is a server with all the girls group shows, privates, and any other show from MFC and other sites. Scam_Models said:Don't suppose you know anything about the dude that April was with? Boyfriend? Studio employee? Both?
I do not know how long these videos are saved. I do not know if the entire session is recorded or just the group and private shows. I do know, it is one of the programmers job to go through these videos. A lot of the MFC Share videos the girls post and the other sites they sell videos comes from these recordings. The girls do not save these videos, the studio does and the girls can decide to post them or not. I am not saying all the videos the girls post for sale are sourced this way, they do custom videos also. I am saying that quite a few of these videos they sell are from past private and group shows the girls have done.GuyRocket said:I wonder why they do that. Why keep thousands of hours of videos? That must cost some decent cash. If the videos are not going to be used, then why spend the time and money to save the videos?
I will expand on this further. I read on nobodyhome that allure studio models live off whales and because of that they don't do anything in private. I got curious after reading this discussion because you say she is good. I went private and she was as moody as you can get. Even though I was as polite and patient as you can be. She took a long time "dancing" while checking her phone. Something like 5 minutes doing the same moves. When I asked if she was ready to get naked, she got angry and moody. She "masturbated" while swearing in Russian. Still checking her phone. When I asked if she could show more, she told me to tip $30. I said goodbye and ended the private.By the way, I don't know why but AprilWon was clearly hiding her face during the private. She was showing her face when she was chatting. But during the terrible striptease and lousy masturbation, her face was out of sight. She positioned the camera so close that it couldn't fit her face in the frame. Usually it disrupts the experience, but she had already ruined the experience that it didn't matter much.I also had a private chat with StacyJey. Much better girl. There are a few things she refuses to do on cam (she won't do a closeup for exmaple) but she does a lot better than April. At least she was nice and polite, smiling and everything. It was just strange that after cumming, she started thanking me and saying goodbye. Usually girls try to get me to chit-chat after they cum.NiceShepard said:April is a royal shit. I am sorry if I offend any of her fans. But she is one of the most grumpy and moody girls I have seen in private. It was a super lousy cam show of a camgirl who seemed angry because I wanted to see her naked in private.
I have also talked with many of the girls that work cam at Allure, and I have talked with the girls that are administrators. Truth be told, no one but MFC knows the reason for this ban of Allure Studios. It would be nice and simple if it was all April's and this dudes fault. Speculation is all we can really have. The girls I have talked with that have been with the studio for years, and a couple that have already left do not think it was April's fault. The Studio also knows about this discussion and other post about this subject. The owners have also been made aware of this situation, but as of yet nothing has been done about it. I am sure if they thought April was the cause, she would no longer be working at Allure. If this guy really was the cause and has cut so deep into the studios bottom line, I am sure he would no longer be allowed there. Again, all speculation. We do not really know the cause and April's incident might all be coincidence. Jimmy Two Times said:It has been 6 weeks since Allure Studio was banned from MyFreeCams, and the truth is the site has never responded to the studio administrators. MFC will not allow new models from the studio to create accounts. This was not a simple mistake or errors with documents. For all intents and purposes, Allure seems to be pretty much done on the site.
I have heard from enough models and members to feel comfortable saying that the guy who got busted in AprilWong's room and the other top guy at the studio are pretty big shitheads. I heard that April is not the first girl from the studio he has tried this with, she is just the first to have been caught on camera. Apparently this is the M.O. of him and his buddy at the studio. They are both very "hands-on" both at the studio and at their company events.
I said this before. MFC won't reply. They rarely reply. They made the decision to ban all the girls and won't explain why. They shouldn't explain, by the way. This would allow the studio to learn from it and adapt so as not to be caught again. The ban is not a lesson, it is a punishment.Jimmy Two Times said:the site has never responded to the studio administrators
We might disagree about some things in this thread and that have happened with Allure Studio, but you always provide good insight and I appreciate your posts and perspective.Charmed said:I have also talked with many of the girls that work cam at Allure, and I have talked with the girls that are administrators. Truth be told, no one but MFC knows the reason for this ban of Allure Studios. It would be nice and simple if it was all April's and this dudes fault. Speculation is all we can really have. The girls I have talked with that have been with the studio for years, and a couple that have already left do not think it was April's fault. The Studio also knows about this discussion and other post about this subject. The owners have also been made aware of this situation, but as of yet nothing has been done about it. I am sure if they thought April was the cause, she would no longer be working at Allure. If this guy really was the cause and has cut so deep into the studios bottom line, I am sure he would no longer be allowed there. Again, all speculation. We do not really know the cause and April's incident might all be coincidence. Jimmy Two Times said:<div>It has been 6 weeks since Allure Studio was banned from MyFreeCams, and the truth is the site has never responded to the studio administrators. MFC will not allow new models from the studio to create accounts. This was not a simple mistake or errors with documents. For all intents and purposes, Allure seems to be pretty much done on the site.</div><div><br></br></div><div>I have heard from enough models and members to feel comfortable saying that the guy who got busted in AprilWong's room and the other top guy at the studio are pretty big shitheads. I heard that April is not the first girl from the studio he has tried this with, she is just the first to have been caught on camera. Apparently this is the M.O. of him and his buddy at the studio. They are both very "hands-on" both at the studio and at their company events.</div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div><div><br></br></div>
I much prefer MFC to the other sites, even with all its problems, it was still a much better site to deal with and track the girls. I still get to see and spend time with my favorite girls from that studio, so for me all this is just a minor inconvenience. These post have been nice to see that there is a following of Allure and hopefully we can see them return to MFC.
The one question I have, if MFC no longer allows studio accounts, how was Allure still on a studio account? Is it possible to just start individual model accounts on MFC, but I can see this being a headache if they cannot connect all those accounts to the same banking account. Just a thought I have been thinking on for a while now. I know a lot of if not most of these girls do not have their own bank accounts and rely on cash system to live. I am surprised more of these studio girls do not go out on their own and earn a lot more. These studio I know have the intention to help these girls but they take to big an advantage of them also.Jimmy Two Times said:We might disagree about some things in this thread and that have happened with Allure Studio, but you always provide good insight and I appreciate your posts and perspective.<a rel="nofollow">Charmed</a> said:&nbsp;
I also would like to see the girls return to MFC, they are the real victims here. But if the site never gets back to the studio, I just don't see it happening.
And while I still believe being caught with a man on camera the day before the ban is the reason, you are correct that it is speculation without MFC responding.
But, if it was coincidence, if nothing else there is enough visual evidence posted here to show that MFC rules were broken multiple times. I might have been too harsh on AprilWong in my previous posts, especially after hearing what I have heard about the guy. But the fact remains that if the rules were followed to begin with, there wouldn't even be the possibility that allowing a man on camera was the reason for the ban.
At the end of the day, this studio which stood out from most of the others and probably made good money for MFC, screwed up so badly somewhere along the line that they got banned. And it isn't like it is a new studio either, this was a well-known studio and for good reason.
I hope you are correct and the owners have been made aware. They need to take a serious look at what could have happened and evaluate what needs to be changed.
ClarkWGriswold said:
A little unbelievable that the studio is still trying to sneak girls on after being banned.
I was wondering the same. MFC as a software is known for being a mess. It is an old system running on top of a bunch of poor code glued together to work as a band-aid on deep cuts. Maybe they just stopped accepting studio accounts, but studio accounts were never really removed from the system. I can imagine it being a nightmare to convert every studio model into individual account. Maybe it can be automate. But because of the documents and payment details, it isn't that straightforward.Charmed said:how was Allure still on a studio account?
Actually you are right. This is totally believable that they would try this. :Tomcat said:<a rel="nofollow">ClarkWGriswold</a> said:<br></br>A little unbelievable that the studio is still trying to sneak girls on after being banned.
Really? I have seen many studios being banned, and almost every studio tried to create new accounts.
Some studios don't even try to figure out what happened. They create new
accounts and think it is all fine. Some studios even hold backup accounts
(CB is full of backup accounts) in case their main accounts are banned.These
studios come from countries where finding tricks to avoid the rules/fines is
considered a good hack life. So yes, they will try a bunch of different ways to
get back to MFC instead of accepting the fact that they fucked up and got
banned. They already tried creating new accounts. And they got the girls to tweet @
MFC to put some pressure, plant doubts in MFC decision and pretend to be
innocent.
I agree 100%.We
are all creating theories here, but we wouldn't need to. If the studio were
professional, they would talk to the girls and explain why they can't
work on MFC anymore. It doesn't matter if MFC isn't replying. The studio knows
or has an idea of why they got banned. MFC wouldn't ban a studio for no
reason. They did something wrong, they know it. They got banned for it and
give zero explanation.
Charmed said:The one question I have, if MFC no longer allows studio accounts, how was Allure still on a studio account? Is it possible to just start individual model accounts on MFC, but I can see this being a headache if they cannot connect all those accounts to the same banking account. Just a thought I have been thinking on for a while now. I know a lot of if not most of these girls do not have their own bank accounts and rely on cash system to live. I am surprised more of these studio girls do not go out on their own and earn a lot more. These studio I know have the intention to help these girls but they take to big an advantage of them also.
Thank you Jimmyj_Two_Times for the compliment. You also give great insight.
An investigation by Ukrainian outlet Zaborona back in 2020 showed that webcam studios are easy prey for blackmail from corrupt police officers.
I knew it was illegal in Ukraine, but after reading these articles, I had no clue that so many were in the industry. 10's of thousands if not 100's of thousands may be working in the industry. I can see why law makers would want to legalize pornography. Potentially, billions in revenue. Thanks for these articles you posted, really informative. ClarkWGriswold said:In a move to stop police spending too much time chasing webcam girls (and sometimes allegedly extorting them) rather than finding more serious criminals said:<br></br>Loading…
www.kyivpost.com
An investigation by&nbsp;<a rel="nofollow" href="https://zaborona.com/webkam-modeli/" title="Link: https://zaborona.com/webkam-modeli/">Ukrainian outlet Zaborona</a>&nbsp;back in 2020 showed that webcam studios are easy prey for blackmail from corrupt police officers.Loading…
brdo.com.ua
I bet outside of the religious crowd, the people most against pornography being legalized in Ukraine are the studios.Charmed said:I knew it was illegal in Ukraine, but after reading these articles, I had no clue that so many were in the industry. 10's of thousands if not 100's of thousands may be working in the industry. I can see why law makers would want to legalize pornography. Potentially, billions in revenue. Thanks for these articles you posted, really informative. ClarkWGriswold said:<br></br><br></br><br></br>In a move to stop police spending too much time chasing webcam girls (and sometimes allegedly extorting them) rather than finding more serious criminals said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;<br></br><br></br>&lt;p&gt;An investigation by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="https://zaborona.com/webkam-modeli/"&gt;Ukrainian outlet Zaborona&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;back in 2020 showed that webcam studios are easy prey for blackmail from corrupt police officers.&lt;/p&gt;
April was online on Flirt 4 Free a week ago. Four days later she started streaming with two other girls on Flirt 4 Free. I don't know them, but I assume those are the girls you mentioned. They are online right now on Tri Amour account.ClarkWGriswold said:It's kind of weird, it appears AprilWong and AlishaBell aren't broadcasting from any of their own accounts any more.
They are broadcasting as SexyTrilogy on AdultWork with MiaMuse. The only site they are multi-camming to is Mia's Chaturbate account.
I wonder why they are streaming to one of Mia's accounts, but none of April's and Alisha's? Mia said on Instagram that the trio would be doing shows together for this month.
Thank you for the info on AdultWork. I still hate that website and agree with you about the interface.Tomcat said:Maybe someone can enlighten me. If they were making good money on MFC and had a good fanbase, why can't they do the same on other sites? Why do their fans not go to whatever site they are now and spend money there? I can't understand why being banned from MFC can be the studio's death if there are so many options out there. Chaturbate and Stripchat have way more traffic than MFC and people tip a lot for the type of show they are doing.
Many reason contribute to the fans not all following their models to other sites. Not all fans are linked to their social media accounts, so they have no clue what happened to them. Some fans are loyal to MFC and have no desire to use other sites, even if they knew where to find the models. Myself, I did follow the ones I like to Chaturbate. I am not a fan of Chaturbate myself and much preferred MFC even with all it's flaws. KelsiDi already had an account on Chaturbate and streamed there often enough. A lot of the other girls also had second accounts on other sites, but MFC was still a better money maker for them. I have also noticed that a lot of these models had the same fans that spent money on them, most being supporters of the Allure girls. Tomcat said:Maybe someone can enlighten me. If they were making good money on MFC and had a good fanbase, why can't they do the same on other sites? Why do their fans not go to whatever site they are now and spend money there? I can't understand why being banned from MFC can be the studio's death if there are so many options out there. Chaturbate and Stripchat have way more traffic than MFC and people tip a lot for the type of show they are doing.<br></br>
Allure Studio started using AdultWork a few months after the war started in Ukraine. The reason, I am not sure, but I do know that the studio tries all the different cam sites. AdultWork has improved a little since they started using it, and it continues to be improved, but still a shit site. AdultWork is the only site that I have seen with a full list of all the girls registered. I find this is a nice feature.Tomcat said:AdultWork is horrible. Its interface is confusing, there is no public chat and traffic is dead. The only good thing they have is the 65%-70% payout. But if you have no member booking a show, the high payout is pointless. It only works for models with sugar daddies that follow them to whatever shitty site the girls direct them.I have also been curious what Allure Studio's deal is with AdultWork. I
have talked to other people who didn't know what AdultWork was before
MFC banned the studio, and none of us have been impressed with it as a
website. But somehow it's the one site where all Allure models work.<br></br>
What is interesting to me is why AprilWong is streaming with these two girls and not MilaVox.ClarkWGriswold said:It's kind of weird, it appears AprilWong and AlishaBell aren't broadcasting from any of their own accounts any more.
They are broadcasting as SexyTrilogy on AdultWork with MiaMuse. The only site they are multi-camming to is Mia's Chaturbate account.
I wonder why they are streaming to one of Mia's accounts, but none of April's and Alisha's? Mia said on Instagram that the trio would be doing shows together for this month.
It seems they're getting the traffic/tips that most of the Allure models get on Chaturbate - not much. But you would think all of them would be streaming to their individual accounts, not just Mia on CB, right?
I have also been curious what Allure Studio's deal is with AdultWork. I have talked to other people who didn't know what AdultWork was before MFC banned the studio, and none of us have been impressed with it as a website. But somehow it's the one site where all Allure models work.
Why do you mention sex trafficking? I have never gotten this impression and I have known a few of the girls through personal chat (old and new). The only men that work in the studio are the programmers. There is also the occasional maintenance worker that comes to repair or remodel work. No guy works cam in that studio. The girls are usually alone majority of the time. I do agree, it is not the same as before. Not even the same as a year ago. But I have yet to think there is sex trafficking going on. I would assume prostitution before I ever think sex trafficking and even this I have never gotten the impression of. Scam_Models said:I'm beginning to think this studio is abusing it's models. Something just doesn't seem right and the way things are unfolding, just screams to me like, sex trafficking.
I hate to be the one to say this, but blaming the minimum salary is not an excuse.In a normal situation, minimum salaries are in tandem with the local economy. To someone in Germany, the Ukrainian minimum salary is awfully low. But guess what? Ukrainian people working in Ukraine are not living in Germany and won't need to pay 2,000 EUR for a one-bedroom flat in Munich. They have low salaries, but the costs are low, too. But I agree that earning the minimum salary doesn't exactly pay for an okay life.There are a lot of Ukrainian and Russian people living now in my country because of the war. I see the ones that struggle and work any job and those that moved with the whole family with a big SUV and rented a newly built nice flat. Let's call the second group "rich". They were working and living in Ukraine a couple of years ago. They are not related to camming at all. And for the record, they don't look like mafia. Yet, they made enough money to buy a new Toyota and provide for a family of four. Again, they made and are still making good money while not being camgirls. And I am not talking about a couple of people who came from rich families. I am talking about many families that started from nothing. Again, NOT related to camming.I know a handful of Ukrainian people who have already started businesses in my country after moving, and they are doing quite well.Another example? Go to Etsy. Many top sellers are from Ukraine. The most common is furniture. They sell well-crafted furniture for decent money, and they are very successful.My point is that if you work a regular job, you get a minimum salary, but a bag of potatoes isn't that expensive. But it is possible to make more money without being involved in camming.I am not against them being camgirls. Of course not. But I hate when they blame the economy, minimum salary, and everything else to justify being a camgirl when, in reality, they all want to make 10x more than the average person and still live in a cheap country.Romanian camgirls blame the same low minimum salary. But Romania's minimum salary is four times Ukraine's minimum salary. What about Poland? The minimum salary there is almost 6x higher than in Ukraine. Yet, you can find thousands of nonnude camgirls from Poland. They all blame their local economy and how shitty the salary is.Charmed said:the average monthly salary is quite low
I suppose he used the term sex trafficking because that is the term. But he may be referring to slavery, exploitative behavior, and abusive situations.Charmed said:Why do you mention sex trafficking?Scam_Models said:I'm beginning to think this studio is abusing it's models. Something just doesn't seem right and the way things are unfolding, just screams to me like, sex trafficking.<br></br>
I think this is a good possibility.ClarkWGriswold said:But she said the gist of what they said was this is her one and only warning. If she got caught again she'd be banned for good.
Got me thinking about this incident. If this happened twice in January, as the screenshots here show, AprilWong/the studio could have gotten a warning. Now since it was part of a studio account, who would have known about the warning? Who knows, but that would just be more speculation on my end.
But if they were indeed warned in January, and then got caught again in February, that would be a good reason to be banned. Especially since they were supposedly one of the last studio accounts, MFC could have just said screw it, we can't trust anyone there.
Again, this is all speculation. And having a man on speaker phone is different than blowing/having sex with a guy while off camera while broadcasting. But it's possible they had complaints and/or gave out a warning before.
This is classic MFC right here. ClarkWGriswold said:Also, don't try to wrap your head around the hypocrisy of MyFreeCams allowing Olivia to do her live call-in shows, while they warned another model about speaking to a friend on speaker phone. As the model told me when I asked her about it: "Check our camscores."
MFC suspended Olivia once, but the reason had nothing to do with any rules. What she did wasn't even mentioned in the rules, and it's still not there.I didn't know Olivia was doing live call-in shows. I don't follow her shows. Gosh, they are boring. But from what I know, her shows are heavily staged. I wouldn't be surprised if the calls were recorded and that she checked with MFC first. Is this recent? Maybe she is using AI for the voice, and then technically it is not a man. Not even a human. Also, Olivia is doing this as part of her act. I assume the other girl was having a personal phone call when she should be giving attention to members. It is the same idea behind the rule that says models must stay in camera sight.I remember when MFC banned streams from public places (restaurants, libraries, etc.). A bunch of girls were still streaming in public places, and people said MFC was protecting them. It turned out they were broadcasting from their private backyards or fake offices. They had checked with MFC if that was okay. I just hate that MFC never clarifies the rules, and everyone is clueless about what is okay and what is not.ClarkWGriswold said:MyFreeCams allowing Olivia to do her live call-in shows, while they warned another model about speaking to a friend on speaker phone.
Have you heard about Kickaz? She was 55 times in the top 10. Not top 100, but top 10. Yes, she was tipping herself a lot as part of her "business strategy". But still, MFC banned her without a warning and never let her return.Self-tipping or not, kickaz made more money for MFC than the whole Allure studio together. She was still banned.I honestly don't think Allure was bringing that much money. Of course, it is a lot of money for a Ukrainian studio. But for MFC, Allure girls are average/below average earners that MFC probably never noticed before this incident. Even if they were important, if MFC decides to ban them, money won't be a reason to change their minds.Jimmy Two Times said:I am sure MFC didn't want to lose the income, but if rules are consistently being broken out in the open...what other choice do they have?
Under her stats tab on this site, under "Recent Snapshots" it has pictures of Olivia's call-in shows from March 19 and 26. She puts a topic up for discussion and has a number for users to call in. It's about as exciting as it sounds, and you can get enough of it from the pictures without having to actually watch anything.Tomcat said:I didn't know Olivia was doing live call-in shows. I don't follow her shows. Gosh, they are boring. But from what I know, her shows are heavily staged. I wouldn't be surprised if the calls were recorded and that she checked with MFC first. Is this recent? Maybe she is using AI for the voice, and then technically it is not a man. Not even a human. Also, Olivia is doing this as part of her act. I assume the other girl was having a personal phone call when she should be giving attention to members. It is the same idea behind the rule that says models must stay in camera sight.
And Allure did have a dozen or more girls every month in the Top 1000. But you make a good point about banning Kickaz. Tomcat said:Have you heard about Kickaz? She was 55 times in the top 10. Not top 100, but top 10. Yes, she was tipping herself a lot as part of her "business strategy". But still, MFC banned her without a warning and never let her return.Self-tipping or not, kickaz made more money for MFC than the whole Allure studio together. She was still banned.I honestly don't think Allure was bringing that much money. Of course, it is a lot of money for a Ukrainian studio. But for MFC, Allure girls are average/below average earners that MFC probably never noticed before this incident. Even if they were important, if MFC decides to ban them, money won't be a reason to change their minds.Jimmy Two Times said:I am sure MFC didn't want to lose the income, but if rules are consistently being broken out in the open...what other choice do they have? <br></br>
I think it will be an interesting next few months for the girls from the studio.Jimmy Two Times said:Also, looks like we are coming up on 2 months since the banning happened on February 23.
There are some pretty big name girls who never came back after the banning. There are plenty more, both successful and lesser known girls, that haven't been online for a month or so.
Sad what has happened to the vast majority of girls/employees who did nothing wrong and just want to make a living.
While that is a nice thought, these girls sign contracts with the studio that would prevent them from doing so.Scam_Models said:I messaged April on LiveJasmin and told her she should ditch studios and work on her own. She said, not possible. The only reason for her saying this is if she's in financial turmoil or as I said, she can't escape whatever situation she's in. Either way, it's pretty sad that a beautiful woman can be so easily taken advantage of by her colleagues. They all look like a bunch of village idiots to be honest.
Scam_Models makes a good point about not being able to escape the situation. The sad reality is most of the time a stable life doesn't lead a girl to get into this line of work. Sure, there can be some nice perks and they can make good money, etc., but some of their backstories are incredibly sad.ClarkWGriswold said:While that is a nice thought, these girls sign contracts with the studio that would prevent them from doing so.Scam_Models said:I messaged April on LiveJasmin and told her she should ditch studios and work on her own. She said, not possible. The only reason for her saying this is if she's in financial turmoil or as I said, she can't escape whatever situation she's in. Either way, it's pretty sad that a beautiful woman can be so easily taken advantage of by her colleagues. They all look like a bunch of village idiots to be honest.
Just another way these girls are victimized and taken advantage of. There's no way they have an attorney look over the contract before they sign. God only knows what is in there.
Although I'm sure if a legit lawyer were to look it over they'd be able to find a loophole or 10 that could free them.
Some of the models in Allure work from Romania. Tiffany, Gina/Eva, Juliafendi, and Liliraider all work in Romania. Could be more, but I have not seen them or even know if they are with Allure. There are the girls that travel to Romania and back to Ukraine that will cam in both places. I know Kelsi does both.Jimmy Two Times said:Well, looks like Allure Studio is giving it another go trying to get a girl back on MFC.
Much like they tried with the SofiBlooom account, the former GinaSpade/ValkyriEva is broadcasting on MFC now as EvaBumm.
If you check AdultWork, she's still with the studio, but it has her country as Romania and says she's accessing from France.
Loading…
www.adultwork.com
Will she suffer the same fate as Sofi?
That was fast. I went to add MFC to Cherie's profile on here and the account was already deleted. According to her MFC stats on this site, she lasted about 90 minutes before they zapped her account: https://mycamgirl.net/stats/myfreecams/cheriedaneJimmy Two Times said:Also interesting that it appears they are trying to get brand new models on MFC.
CherieDane. who is part of the Allure Studio group on AdultWork and has been broadcasting on Chaturbate just started broadcasting on MyFreeCams today.
Loading…
www.adultwork.com
It looks like there are quite a few profiles of new models set up on the Allure page on AdultWork. Be interesting to see if they start broadcasting on MFC soon and if they stick around.
And the 44 minutes she spent in private/group are gone. She will never be paid for that. I wonder why MFC approves a new account for a model/studio they don't want on the site only to ban them almost immediately after getting online for the first time.ClarkWGriswold said:According to her MFC stats on this site, she lasted about 90 minutes
Just a guess on my part, but EvaBumm was broadcasting from a new studio, with what I'm assuming was a new IP address. Cherie was a new girl with what I'm assuming was a new IP address broadcasting from a recognized Allure Studio room. Tomcat said:And the 44 minutes she spent in private/group are gone. She will never be paid for that. I wonder why MFC approves a new account for a model/studio they don't want on the site only to ban them almost immediately after getting online for the first time.ClarkWGriswold said:According to her MFC stats on this site, she lasted about 90 minutes
Community
Comments
315