BikiniKing said:Interesting...but not true!I know for sure she has more regulars! o
![]()
Sure, it's possible she schedules shows for multiple people. I just said it's less likely that that is the case. If you have inside info, great.BikiniKing said:You guys are really drawing conclusions (on the basis of the stats of camroster, which basically only show online presence and usage of the model, not with whom) waaaaay to fast. But okay, believe what you wanna believe! I know for a fact, it is not true!![]()
Were you the only person in the VIP?num19 said:The other day she did a vip show. The description was gibberish, so I did no know what she would do. But I bought a ticket anyway. Turned out she did quite a lot. There was no masturbation, only some rubbing in a sexy way. But she got all naked, showing tits, pussy and even butthole. Pretty good for $3. After that someone took her for 2 hours in exclusive private.
No, he wasn't.Scam_Models said:Were you the only person in the VIP?num19 said:The other day she did a vip show. The description was gibberish, so I did no know what she would do. But I bought a ticket anyway. Turned out she did quite a lot. There was no masturbation, only some rubbing in a sexy way. But she got all naked, showing tits, pussy and even butthole. Pretty good for $3. After that someone took her for 2 hours in exclusive private.<br></br><br></br>
No. I can't be precise because I don't pay attention to this, but there were at least 5 members.Scam_Models said:Were you the only person in the VIP?num19 said:The other day she did a vip show. The description was gibberish, so I did no know what she would do. But I bought a ticket anyway. Turned out she did quite a lot. There was no masturbation, only some rubbing in a sexy way. But she got all naked, showing tits, pussy and even butthole. Pretty good for $3. After that someone took her for 2 hours in exclusive private.<br></br><br></br>
User engagement. Maybe as a backup plan in case her sugar daddy dumps her. I think it is a good idea, just in case. I have seen camgirls relying too much on one member and taking them for granted. And then, for whatever reason, that member is gone, and the girl takes a long time to make the same money again.NiceShepard said:I don't know why she needs to spam and invite me to go private.
I'm pretty sure he said she changed her age, meaning the correct age was present and then it changed. As for LiveJasmin, models are not required to give the correct age. I think the rule of thumb is, they can adjust their age /- 5 years.RaggedyBunny said:I had to create this account just so I could react to this nonsense!
The only thing here in need of any sugar are your brains.. maybe they'll function a little brighter..
You can look up the stats clearly showing, that her privates are with completely varying durations and then after a few minutes a new one starts.. Is it really that hard to believe someone to just be desired and successful in what they do.. As all of you drooling here for her, if you caught the right moment you'd also grab the chance to have a private so.. hence the high private time & count..
And where the hell has she changed her age, you dimwits, this site has just gotten her age wrong.. For whatever reason.
One sugar daddy, multiple sugar daddies... What I meant is that she has a man or multiple men who have developed a virtual love relationship with her and are no longer (if they ever did) going private to watch a nude show. They pay for her to be their virtual girlfriend, their companion, and to fulfill the emptiness in their lives. This is one possible scenario in which a sugar daddy exists.RaggedyBunny said:I had to create this account just so I could react to this nonsense!
The only thing here in need of any sugar are your brains.. maybe they'll function a little brighter..
You can look up the stats clearly showing, that her privates are with completely varying durations and then after a few minutes a new one starts.. Is it really that hard to believe someone to just be desired and successful in what they do.. As all of you drooling here for her, if you caught the right moment you'd also grab the chance to have a private so.. hence the high private time & count..
And where the hell has she changed her age, you dimwits, this site has just gotten her age wrong.. For whatever reason.
I'm not arguing that her profile listed 32 at some point. She started streaming back in 2015, and at the time you only needed to submit a passport photo, which can easily be edited. Nowadays, LiveJasmin's policy has changed, and they require additional documents, including a selfie. On top of that, her birth date was always listed as January 4, 1993. It seems it was only this year, when she bumped her age down to 28, that her birth date changed as well—it’s now late June. To me, it's pretty obvious she started streaming when she was 18, and 11 years have passed since then. But honestly, it doesn't really matter.NiceShepard said:
It was an automated broadcast sent to everyone who has her favorited. I got the video on all my accounts—even on the ones where I've never taken her to private or VIP.NiceShepard said:This aligns with the teasing video she sent to me out of nowhere last year. It looked out of place because we haven't spoken in years. But if she was already predicting that her single sugar daddy was going to leave her soon, spamming old members is one of the responses. I have seen this before with other models. When the sugar daddy moves on, the model goes through her history of privat chats to identify good members who are worth "reconnecting" with.
I haven't noticed that at all. Plus, since she doesn't use a Lovense/Lush, she doesn't even ask for tips during private shows, unlike other models.NiceShepard said: My main problem with her is her mood/attitude in private in the last years. I don't feel welcome in her private chat. She acts cranky if you want to see her naked, and, unless you are a long-time die-hard fan, she gets defensive/suspicious if you try to have a conversation about her. Not the best model if you are not a regular in her room.
She actually still has clients like that. I’ve seen it a couple of times over the past month where she was offline, and then popped up just for one long private show.NiceShepard said:I am 100% sure she had a sugar daddy, maybe 2-3 years ago, when she was spending no time in free chat. She would get online, and in less than 1 minute she would be in an exclusive private chat for the whole night. That is the usual activity when a model has a sugar daddy and direct contact with him. This changed last year or so, and that is one of the reasons I say she no longer has that sugar daddy.
But as I said, she is a successful model. That guy left, but she kept having long private chats.
I think I should clarify my understanding of what a sugar daddy is. Being a regular member does not make you a sugar daddy. What you pay for and how you pay for it is what makes you a sugar daddy. If you go private once per week to watch her get naked and masturbate for 1 hour, you are not a sugar daddy. If she gets online only to have private with you and you pay her (and tip on top of that) to only chat for 5 hours, then you are a sugar daddy. If you go private for hours so she can sleep (I have seen it before), then you are a sugar daddy, a dumb one. I could give more examples, but you get the idea.
She does look amazing. Look at this picture of her from a few weeks ago.Revuinton said:On top of that, she looks amazing - honestly even younger than 29.
This aligns with the teasing video she sent to me out of nowhere last year. It looked out of place because we haven't spoken in years. But if she was already predicting that her single sugar daddy was going to leave her soon, spamming old members is one of the responses. I have seen this before with other models. When the sugar daddy moves on, the model goes through her history of privat chats to identify good members who are worth "reconnecting" with.Revuinton said:Yeah, her private shows can be long, but it’s definitely not just one person. I checked the stats from May 1 to June 30, 2026, and she spent almost 8 hours in free chat and 50 hours in private chat during that period.
It is a pretty solid amount in most countries. But that is also besides the point. She is a successful model. I never contested that. I will even add that she is successful and she deserves it. I may not agree with some things, but it is nothing outrageous. Is her age frozen in time? It is ok. She spams me (only once). It is fine. Annoying? Maybe. But it is fine. I have seen models doing much worse. My main problem with her is her mood/attitude in private in the last years. I don't feel welcome in her private chat. She acts cranky if you want to see her naked, and, unless you are a long-time die-hard fan, she gets defensive/suspicious if you try to have a conversation about her. Not the best model if you are not a regular in her room.Revuinton said:it’s a pretty solid amount for Ukraine,
I think she had a domi before. Or something similar. A tip-controlled sex toy. I am not sure. But she had sex toys before. In the beginning, she had plenty of sex toys. And she was doing anal sex, something that she seems to have stopped doing years later. At least, every attempt I made to get her to finger her ass was shut down. I remember she had no problem doing anal on the first private we had many years ago.Revuinton said:She also started using a domi.
I am 100% sure she had a sugar daddy, maybe 2-3 years ago, when she was spending no time in free chat. She would get online, and in less than 1 minute she would be in an exclusive private chat for the whole night. That is the usual activity when a model has a sugar daddy and direct contact with him. This changed last year or so, and that is one of the reasons I say she no longer has that sugar daddy.Revuinton said:So I think your theories about her having a sugar daddy don't really hold up.
Community
Comments
23